Guest post by Becky Harris
I grew up in the suburbs of St. Louis but farming running deeps in my family and as Laura herself said, what is bred in the bone will come out in the flesh. My parents bought 80 acres of rolling land on the bluffs of the Mississippi River and we became weekend beef farmers. The house on the land was very old and a bit like something from Little House on the Prairie. Wide logs, a place over the door for a musket, wood burning fireplaces, and old newspapers in the walls for insulation. There were even the geraniums in coffee cans in the windows. We had electricity and running water but no central heat and no T.V reception. I spent many weekends huddled up in a chair close to the fire reading old books salvaged from basements and garage sales for our amusement. Those nights by the fire I met heroines who became like old friends: Anne Shirley, Jo March, Nancy Drew, and Laura herself. I don’t remember exactly how old I was when I finished the original series and excitedly picked up The First Four Years, but I couldn’t have been over 10. Old enough to sense the difference in the writing style and characterizations, too young to name what felt so different. I was young enough to have not yet seen Laura’s courtship on the t.v. show and to be confused about who Manly was and wonder what on earth he had done with Almanzo, for whom I had a crush. For a good part of the book I thought Manly was a third wheel, the eternal houseguest who never leaves. I don’t remember how or when I sorted that one out, but eventually I did.
The first ten pages of Chapter One are a recap of the end of These Happy Golden Years: the meddling sister and mother, the hasty wedding plans, the wedding itself, and the last supper at home. As a child it all felt so grim – Ma brushing away tears, the choke in Laura’s throat, the quick ceremony in the parlor. Weddings were supposed to be loud, and fun, with lots of food and lots of dancing and, if you’re from St. Louis, a steady flow of Anheuser – Busch beer. But after 17 years of marriage and a cross country move away from family I know the truth: sometimes, despite what Say Yes to the Dress may lead us to believe, life and marriage can be grim. Manly and Laura will be asked to endure so much in this book, but this chapter contains one of my favorite lines: “Manly understood, for he covered Laura’s hand with one of his and pressed it strongly”. For better or for worse, they are together. The first year was begun.
Comments14
just discovered this web site a few weeks ago and am so excited to participate in a read along from the beginning.
I find it interesting that the focus of the pre wedding conversation in THGY is about removing the word “obey” and in TFFY is about the bargain Laura and Manly make about farming for 3 years. Since this is Laura’s un edited manuscript I am sure this bargain took place. I have no doubt the issue with the word obey also was brought up, I wonder if they were on separate occasions.
The obey conversation must have happened because Laura’s writes about it in an article before she started writing the books. I’ve always wondered if the bargain really happened or was put in to develop a central theme/struggle for the book. Their attempt at farming in Dakota was an unmitigated disaster but they never quit.
If if did happen, I’d suspect it must have been considerably BEFORE the time it happened in the books. It’s a bit late to decide that “I don’t want to be a farmer’s wife” when you’ve already been engaged for the better part of a year, and your fiance has almost finished building you a house on a patch of ground that he will lose if he DOESN’T farm it.
She certainly knew what she was getting into when she accepted the ring.
Nice job, Becky! I always thought it sounded grim, as a child, too. Now, I think it sounds like 2 people who are happy and comfortable with each other, and don’t need a lot of hoopla.
Lovely review and comments. After being married, one does realize that all the other people around are wonderful supports but marriage is about the 2 and the experiences only 2 can share. The respect that Manly and Laura have for each other is what really touches me. That respect and love is what will carry them through.
It’s such a grim beginning. I was so surprised when I read that someone remembered attending a barn dance in honor of the wedding. It could have been very simple, but they were so involved in the town that it makes sense that some celebration happened. To include it would make the start happier, and I wonder why Laura chose not to include it.
I know it was discussed briefly when we were commenting on the differences between this and THGY, it’s worth looking at the differences between the two versions of the scene.
Laura is sewing while dressed in her new pink lawn (which would have made a very nice wedding dress) rather than the calico work dress in the other book.
The house is a ‘low three room shanty’ rather than the four room house, and Pa’s ground is ‘newly broke.’
This last is especially interesting, suggesting a radical change in the timeline. Why suggest that Pa has just settled the claim, and turned the sod for the first time, rather than being just about ready to prove-up? Could she have wanted to mask Pa’s failure to succeed after 4 years on the land? (His inability to afford even a small wedding for her?)
Ooo, super-excited about this readalong (possibly because my life otherwise consists entirely of grading assignments at this time of year, but I’d’ve been excited anyway) and, Becky, what a great starting post, I loved it. I totally shared your initial Manly confusion.
I came to FFY late in the day, even though it had long been published before I started reading the main series (my hand-me-down copies must have been originally acquired before it came out). It fascinates me. The editor’s blurb in the front of my edition says: “Most of us who have read and loved all seven of the books about Laura’s pioneer childhood in America, beginning with Little House in the Big Woods, when she was only a little girl, will have thought sadly, as they finished These Happy Golden Years, by which time she had grown up into a spirited and pretty young lady: ‘And that’s the very end’. But luckily for us there is just a little more…”
Which is pretty much how I felt!
That said, first read was a mixture of horror and disappointment. This first section drove me mad for being the same as THGY and yet annoyingly different in details I by then knew by heart – even the spelling of Pierson annoyed me (I say ‘annoyed’ like I’m over it now, which I’m not, actually. I seem to recall agreeing with Sandra Hume a while back to map all the differences out for a presentation someday – Sandra, you realise you may end up acting as my continuity error therapist if we do that).
After the grimness of the rest of the story, I emerged feeling battered, but also with a weird feeling of triumph that my loyalty had been tested and I got through it – I was a Grown Up Laura fan from here on in.
I’m really interested in everyone’s comments about the wedding; I love the understatement of it so much now I genuinely can’t remember if I ever felt any different, though Naomi’s comment about the pink lawn reminded me I definitely remember thinking that would have been a prettier dress for the wedding. This was obviously long before Katie Price totally killed pink as a wedding dress colour.
totally agree about the Manly thing. It took me half the book to realize this is my Almanzo (first time through). I also thought the pink lawn would have been a much prettier and cooler dress for an August wedding.
I have not had the privilege of reading Pioneer Girl. For those who have, is this scene in that manuscript and if so how is it different?
Yeah it’s read along time!
Re: the pink lawn- I always thought it was strange she was sewing in her Sunday dress!! Also when she is unpacking (can’t remember if that was in this section or not) another dress shows up! I always wondered where that dress came from since so much time was spent in THGY describing clothes.
As a kid, I always took the THGY version as “the truth” of what happened and tried to ignore the intro section to TFFY.
As I was reading the comments I was struck by the fact the LIW the author was trying her hand at adult novels – Laura was a fully realized “grown up” at the beginning of FFY. LIW-the author-may have thought that she had a built in audience from her series (what happens next), but she may have also considered writing an entire adult series, finding a new audience and this was the setup – there could’ve been thoughts of First Four Years, The Next 5 years etc – it MAY have crossed her mind to write about her time in Spring Valley or Florida and could have easily morphed into another short novel about the early years in Mansfield.
As a girl who grew up on a farm, the inner controversy of marrying a farmer and continuing the life that she always knew is very real. I couldn’t WAIT to get off of the farm (and still get roped into the occasional farm work when I am at my parents’ farm). The hard work she discusses is very real. But Laura doesn’t seem to have this struggle in THGY because maybe the Laura character was so wrapped up in happily ever after that it would not have been good writing to have any doubts about Almanzo or farming. The appreciation/realization that farming is a great choice of life to have is usually something that comes along with maturity and that might just be the final realization of the character of Laura. I also enjoy the fact that Manly and Laura (why wouldn’t she be called Bessie in this book??) are on equal footing from a respect and love level.
Eddie said:
I seem to recall agreeing with Sandra Hume a while back to map all the differences out for a presentation someday – Sandra, you realise you may end up acting as my continuity error therapist if we do that.
Oh, Eddie, YES. Yes. And you for me.
Laura was an intuitive writer. Her characters aged and so did the language of the books. She assumed that her readers were maturing along with this. TFFY is a continuation of her story but I think she decided not to continue for some very good reasons that most of you have already mentioned: It was a very difficult time period in her life. She didn’t write about Burr Oak for the same reason.
Eddie mentioned “passing the test” and that made me think about life and friendship in general. By the time THGY ends we know Laura. We know the Ingalls family. If we as a group were sitting and chatting, I have no doubt that we could talk about the time Carrie wore her buttons inside out, or Laura rocked the seat and we would all laugh and get the joke about our friends. Laura is our friend and we know her and her people.
But how many of us in our real lives have been completely stunned by someone close to us letting us in on a secret on something that they have kept hidden because they were afraid of what we might think or how we might judge them? The original series is the public face of the life Laura wanted us to see. It’s cleaned up and all bright with wise sayings and happy endings.
Real life has tarnish.
TFFY is the real Laura without the polish, the cleaning up. She never intended for us to read it and possibly judge her or Almanzo. She probably wrote the book then realized that though she got us through grasshoppers and blizzards she couldn’t get us through year after year of crop failures, drought, illness and the death of her son along with the fire that destroyed their home; so much tragedy in so short of time is almost impossible to polish. So she let us think that it all went well. By the time the books were published she and Almanzo were doing okay. The First years of their marriage was all so long ago in the past, least said, soonest mended. Besides, all’s well that ends well.
Eddie is right, this book is a test. We see our old friend more how she actually is rather than as her public face. We pass the test because we love her still; tarnish and all.
I have been lurking for years, because my phone &computer never let Mr post. I hope this goes through. Awesome reading, terrific comments, I’ve thought the same things. Also, this is the first time I ever read anything about wearing gloves, but back then women didn’t leave the house without hat & gloves.
Comments are closed.